Partner keeps identity
The partner remains the partner. TA-14 does not rename, absorb, own, or present the partner architecture as a TA-14 product.
TA-14 Partner Review Network
The TA-14 Partner Review Network creates a governed pathway for serious adjacent architectures, reviewers, referrers, runtime builders, evidence systems, trust platforms, and implementation partners. Partners keep their identity. TA-14 remains the independent admissibility architecture and second-layer review authority.
Cooperation can include referral, scoped review, partner-track review, strategic ecosystem work, or a $5,000+ Partner API Scope. None of those pathways automatically creates endorsement, certification, merger, or unrestricted use of TA-14 language.
Network principle
The network is designed for complementary systems that may contribute evidence, identity, runtime control, policy, refusal, audit, trust, environmental, or implementation capability. TA-14 reviews how those systems attach to consequence-bearing routes without erasing their independent architecture.
The partner remains the partner. TA-14 does not rename, absorb, own, or present the partner architecture as a TA-14 product.
TA-14 maps the partner contribution against evidence, continuity, authority, reliance, binding, commit, execution, outcome, and future-chain inheritance.
Public language, commercial use, review status, API integration, economics, and client-facing representations require explicit written approval.
Partner classes
TA-14 separates partner classes so referral, review, integration, and strategic collaboration are not blurred into one undefined relationship.
A written relationship defining where the adjacent architecture ends, where TA-14 begins, and what language may be used.
The partner introduces relevant clients or opportunities but does not deliver TA-14 review or integration work.
The partner has a defined architecture, route, product, or client use case that may receive bounded TA-14 review.
The relationship may support repeat review, contribution-based work, or a recurring written pathway under approved terms.
The partner requires TA-14 logic, fields, decision states, private rules, or response behavior integrated into its product or workflow.
A deeper relationship involving reciprocal value, market pathways, institutional opportunities, or multi-party delivery.
A specialist may contribute a defined assessment layer without claiming to perform the TA-14 second-layer review.
A technical or operational partner may implement approved components under a written scope without becoming the TA-14 authority.
Core boundary
A partner may deliver its own specialized work. TA-14 performs the independent second-layer admissible-execution review. No partner may self-certify as TA-14-reviewed, TA-14-aligned, TA-14-backed, route-complete, admissible, certification-ready, or production-ready without a separate written authorization covering that exact claim.
Partner API Scope
Partner API Scope is not a logo exchange or informal alignment statement. It is the written work required to map TA-14 decision logic into a partner product, workflow, private API, or enforcement surface.
Define the evidence, authority, continuity, reliance, binding, commit, execution, and outcome fields required by the integration.
Define when the partner surface should return ALLOW, HOLD, DENY, or ESCALATE.
Define private rulesets, risk classes, versioning, supersession, and re-evaluation requirements.
Define how submitted conditions connect to authenticated sources, identity, authority, hashes, or signed evidence.
Define the decision receipt, reason codes, failed links, warnings, and record persistence required after evaluation.
Define whether TA-14 advises, gates, blocks, pauses, escalates, or records the partner system's action.
Define how post-action results return to the architecture and become evidence for the next chain.
Define exactly what the partner may say publicly about review, integration, readiness, alignment, or TA-14 participation.
Public sandbox versus private partner implementation
The public sandbox evaluates caller-submitted conditions. A private partner implementation may connect those conditions to authenticated evidence, identity, delegated authority, private rules, signed receipts, persistent records, integrations, re-evaluation, and outcome memory.
Open routes, typed requests, structured responses, and ALLOW / HOLD / DENY / ESCALATE behavior.
Client-specific fields, rules, authentication, evidence bindings, receipts, storage, and integrations.
Security, deployment, operational testing, monitoring, support, and institutional accountability under written scope.
Economics and origination continuity
Partner economics must be written for the specific relationship. TA-14's current network model preserves partner-originated value and separates origination from execution contribution.
In the standard partner-originated pathway, the originating partner may retain 85% of its delivered partner scope while TA-14 receives 15% for the second-layer role, subject to written terms.
The originator may receive 15% on future TA-14 scopes with the client where written origination continuity applies.
A representative pathway may allocate 70% to the executing review partner, 15% to TA-14, and 15% to the originator or contributing partner, depending on the written scope.
Economic boundary
Economics depend on origination, contribution, execution responsibility, client ownership, scope, evidence burden, and written approval. Public examples explain the model; they do not create a contract.
Non-claims
The network is intentionally bounded so useful collaboration does not become uncontrolled status language.
TA-14 does not take ownership of the partner's architecture, product, methods, brand, clients, or independent identity.
Review, referral, or integration does not create a blanket endorsement of the company, product, deployment, security posture, or legal posture.
No partner becomes TA-14 certified or production-approved merely by entering a review or integration pathway.
TA-14 name, marks, review language, partner status, and alignment claims require written approval.
Schemas, rules, route design, proof objects, test matrices, integration work, and maturity roadmaps require paid scope or reciprocal written value.
A partner cannot perform its own specialized work and represent that work as the independent TA-14 layer.
Request partner scope
Submit the partner architecture, the consequence-bearing route, the evidence it can show, the client or market pathway, the contribution being offered, the language requested, and whether the relationship is referral, review, API integration, implementation, or strategic ecosystem work.