TA-14 Partner Review Network

Independent architectures. Written boundaries. Shared value without absorption.

The TA-14 Partner Review Network creates a governed pathway for serious adjacent architectures, reviewers, referrers, runtime builders, evidence systems, trust platforms, and implementation partners. Partners keep their identity. TA-14 remains the independent admissibility architecture and second-layer review authority.

Cooperation can include referral, scoped review, partner-track review, strategic ecosystem work, or a $5,000+ Partner API Scope. None of those pathways automatically creates endorsement, certification, merger, or unrestricted use of TA-14 language.

Network principle

TA-14 does not absorb serious architectures. It governs the boundary between them.

The network is designed for complementary systems that may contribute evidence, identity, runtime control, policy, refusal, audit, trust, environmental, or implementation capability. TA-14 reviews how those systems attach to consequence-bearing routes without erasing their independent architecture.

01

Partner keeps identity

The partner remains the partner. TA-14 does not rename, absorb, own, or present the partner architecture as a TA-14 product.

02

TA-14 governs the route

TA-14 maps the partner contribution against evidence, continuity, authority, reliance, binding, commit, execution, outcome, and future-chain inheritance.

03

Written boundaries control claims

Public language, commercial use, review status, API integration, economics, and client-facing representations require explicit written approval.

Partner classes

Not every relationship is the same.

TA-14 separates partner classes so referral, review, integration, and strategic collaboration are not blurred into one undefined relationship.

B

Boundary-only

A written relationship defining where the adjacent architecture ends, where TA-14 begins, and what language may be used.

R

Referral-only

The partner introduces relevant clients or opportunities but does not deliver TA-14 review or integration work.

S

Scoped review candidate

The partner has a defined architecture, route, product, or client use case that may receive bounded TA-14 review.

P

Partner-track candidate

The relationship may support repeat review, contribution-based work, or a recurring written pathway under approved terms.

A

API integration partner

The partner requires TA-14 logic, fields, decision states, private rules, or response behavior integrated into its product or workflow.

E

Strategic ecosystem partner

A deeper relationship involving reciprocal value, market pathways, institutional opportunities, or multi-party delivery.

V

Review contributor

A specialist may contribute a defined assessment layer without claiming to perform the TA-14 second-layer review.

I

Implementation contributor

A technical or operational partner may implement approved components under a written scope without becoming the TA-14 authority.

Core boundary

No partner may privately become the TA-14 layer.

A partner may deliver its own specialized work. TA-14 performs the independent second-layer admissible-execution review. No partner may self-certify as TA-14-reviewed, TA-14-aligned, TA-14-backed, route-complete, admissible, certification-ready, or production-ready without a separate written authorization covering that exact claim.

Partner API Scope

$5,000+ for a real integration boundary.

Partner API Scope is not a logo exchange or informal alignment statement. It is the written work required to map TA-14 decision logic into a partner product, workflow, private API, or enforcement surface.

F

Field mapping

Define the evidence, authority, continuity, reliance, binding, commit, execution, and outcome fields required by the integration.

D

Decision states

Define when the partner surface should return ALLOW, HOLD, DENY, or ESCALATE.

R

Rules and versions

Define private rulesets, risk classes, versioning, supersession, and re-evaluation requirements.

E

Evidence binding

Define how submitted conditions connect to authenticated sources, identity, authority, hashes, or signed evidence.

S

Signed receipts

Define the decision receipt, reason codes, failed links, warnings, and record persistence required after evaluation.

X

Execution boundary

Define whether TA-14 advises, gates, blocks, pauses, escalates, or records the partner system's action.

O

Outcome exchange

Define how post-action results return to the architecture and become evidence for the next chain.

C

Claim control

Define exactly what the partner may say publicly about review, integration, readiness, alignment, or TA-14 participation.

Public sandbox versus private partner implementation

The public API demonstrates the decision surface. Partner scope creates the evidence-connected implementation.

The public sandbox evaluates caller-submitted conditions. A private partner implementation may connect those conditions to authenticated evidence, identity, delegated authority, private rules, signed receipts, persistent records, integrations, re-evaluation, and outcome memory.

PUB

Public reference

Open routes, typed requests, structured responses, and ALLOW / HOLD / DENY / ESCALATE behavior.

PRI

Private implementation

Client-specific fields, rules, authentication, evidence bindings, receipts, storage, and integrations.

PRD

Production boundary

Security, deployment, operational testing, monitoring, support, and institutional accountability under written scope.

Economics and origination continuity

Contribution and origination should remain visible.

Partner economics must be written for the specific relationship. TA-14's current network model preserves partner-originated value and separates origination from execution contribution.

85/15

Partner-originated client

In the standard partner-originated pathway, the originating partner may retain 85% of its delivered partner scope while TA-14 receives 15% for the second-layer role, subject to written terms.

15%

Origination continuity

The originator may receive 15% on future TA-14 scopes with the client where written origination continuity applies.

70/15/15

Multi-partner contribution

A representative pathway may allocate 70% to the executing review partner, 15% to TA-14, and 15% to the originator or contributing partner, depending on the written scope.

Economic boundary

No percentage applies automatically.

Economics depend on origination, contribution, execution responsibility, client ownership, scope, evidence burden, and written approval. Public examples explain the model; they do not create a contract.

Non-claims

Partnership does not erase the distinction between review, integration, endorsement, and certification.

The network is intentionally bounded so useful collaboration does not become uncontrolled status language.

Not merger or absorption

TA-14 does not take ownership of the partner's architecture, product, methods, brand, clients, or independent identity.

Not endorsement

Review, referral, or integration does not create a blanket endorsement of the company, product, deployment, security posture, or legal posture.

Not certification

No partner becomes TA-14 certified or production-approved merely by entering a review or integration pathway.

Not unrestricted name use

TA-14 name, marks, review language, partner status, and alignment claims require written approval.

Not free architecture design

Schemas, rules, route design, proof objects, test matrices, integration work, and maturity roadmaps require paid scope or reciprocal written value.

Not private self-review

A partner cannot perform its own specialized work and represent that work as the independent TA-14 layer.

Request partner scope

Bring the architecture, the route, the evidence, and the relationship you are proposing.

Submit the partner architecture, the consequence-bearing route, the evidence it can show, the client or market pathway, the contribution being offered, the language requested, and whether the relationship is referral, review, API integration, implementation, or strategic ecosystem work.