TA-14 Fixed-Fee Pricing

Market-aware pricing without the bloat.

TA-14 makes early admissible-execution review easy to approve: fixed fee, clear scope, written finding, and a bounded review lane before deeper architecture work begins.

At least 25% lower Built to sit below common market entry points while preserving review authority.
$250 Public-material review
$450 Evidence gap review
$950 Route-complete readiness
$750+ Partner-review scope

Market context

Comparable review work often starts higher. TA-14 starts earlier.

Public pricing references commonly place small productized AI audits around $999, narrow AI readiness audits around $2,000 to $8,000, and AI governance readiness consulting assessments in the five-figure range.

TA-14 deliberately offers lower fixed-fee review lanes so founders, builders, partner candidates, and small teams can get an early architecture-facing finding before buying heavier consulting, compliance, certification, or implementation work.

Evidence Gap

Evidence Gap Review

$450

Submitted-material review for a bounded route, workflow, system claim, or evidence packet.

About 55% below a $999 productized audit reference.
Route Review

Route-Complete Readiness Review

$950

One consequence-bearing route reviewed across evidence, authority, reliance, commit, execution, and outcome.

At least 52% below a $2,000 readiness-audit floor.
Partner Lane

Partner Review Network Scope

$750+

Partner lane classification, written claim boundaries, and TA-14 second-layer review boundary.

At least 25% below a $999 entry review reference.
Boundary preserved: fixed-fee review identifies findings and gaps. Custom build direction requires separate written scope. Request Review

Side-by-side

Simple enough to say yes. Bounded enough to protect the work.

The comparison below uses conservative public market anchors. TA-14 is not replacing legal, regulatory, SOC 2, ISO, cybersecurity, or enterprise certification work. It is a bounded admissible-execution architecture review before consequence-bearing reliance hardens.

Initial Review

Public-facing AI / governance review

Market reference: $999 productized AI audit entry point.

$250
about 75% lower
Evidence Gap

Bounded route or evidence packet review

Market reference: $999 productized AI audit entry point.

$450
about 55% lower
Readiness

Route-complete readiness review

Market reference: $2,000 to $8,000 narrow readiness audit range.

$950
at least 52% lower
Partner Scope

Partner-review network scoping

Market reference: $999+ productized review / $2,000+ readiness floor.

$750+
at least 25% lower

What the fixed fee buys

A review finding, not an open-ended consulting engagement.

TA-14 review is designed to show what is strong, what is partial, what is incomplete, and what cannot yet be treated as admissible enough for reliance, binding, commit, execution, or outcome accountability.

1

Architecture-facing finding

TA-14 maps the submitted route against Reality, Record, Continuity, Admissibility, Binding, Commit, Execution, and Outcome.

2

Evidence gap clarity

The review distinguishes what is shown, what is claimed, what is missing, and where reliance would be premature.

3

Bounded next step

The finding can support a paid deeper review, partner lane, or production-readiness scope without giving away unlimited architecture work.

Pricing boundary

Low-cost review does not mean unlimited architecture development.

Fixed-fee TA-14 review may identify gaps, classify evidence, map review findings, and define what is incomplete. Custom implementation guidance, route design, test matrices, evidence packet design, maturity roadmaps, partner operating models, and production-readiness build direction require separate written scope.

TA-14 keeps the first review accessible so teams can see the admissibility gap early. Deeper architecture shaping begins only after scope, boundary, and value exchange are clear.

Public pricing references

Market references used for comparison.

These references are used only to show public market entry points for audit, readiness, governance, and consulting-adjacent review. TA-14 review remains a bounded admissible-execution architecture review, not a certification, legal opinion, compliance attestation, or security audit.

Request review

Request a TA-14 review.

Send the route, the consequence, the evidence, the relying party, and where authority, binding, commit, execution, and outcome records appear. TA-14 will identify the proper review lane before deeper architecture value is provided.

To request a TA-14 review, include:

  1. What system, workflow, evidence process, or architecture should be reviewed.
  2. What consequence-bearing action, reliance, intervention, or decision may occur.
  3. What evidence currently supports that action.
  4. Who or what relies on the evidence.
  5. Where authority, binding, commit, execution, and outcome records appear.

Direct contact: ta14admissibleexecution@gmail.com