Public-Material Architecture Review
Website, documentation, repository, article, whitepaper, deck, or public governance claim review.
About 75% below a $999 productized audit reference.TA-14 Fixed-Fee Pricing
TA-14 makes early admissible-execution review easy to approve: fixed fee, clear scope, written finding, and a bounded review lane before deeper architecture work begins.
Market context
Public pricing references commonly place small productized AI audits around $999, narrow AI readiness audits around $2,000 to $8,000, and AI governance readiness consulting assessments in the five-figure range.
TA-14 deliberately offers lower fixed-fee review lanes so founders, builders, partner candidates, and small teams can get an early architecture-facing finding before buying heavier consulting, compliance, certification, or implementation work.
Website, documentation, repository, article, whitepaper, deck, or public governance claim review.
About 75% below a $999 productized audit reference.Submitted-material review for a bounded route, workflow, system claim, or evidence packet.
About 55% below a $999 productized audit reference.One consequence-bearing route reviewed across evidence, authority, reliance, commit, execution, and outcome.
At least 52% below a $2,000 readiness-audit floor.Partner lane classification, written claim boundaries, and TA-14 second-layer review boundary.
At least 25% below a $999 entry review reference.Side-by-side
The comparison below uses conservative public market anchors. TA-14 is not replacing legal, regulatory, SOC 2, ISO, cybersecurity, or enterprise certification work. It is a bounded admissible-execution architecture review before consequence-bearing reliance hardens.
Market reference: $999 productized AI audit entry point.
Market reference: $999 productized AI audit entry point.
Market reference: $2,000 to $8,000 narrow readiness audit range.
Market reference: $999+ productized review / $2,000+ readiness floor.
What the fixed fee buys
TA-14 review is designed to show what is strong, what is partial, what is incomplete, and what cannot yet be treated as admissible enough for reliance, binding, commit, execution, or outcome accountability.
TA-14 maps the submitted route against Reality, Record, Continuity, Admissibility, Binding, Commit, Execution, and Outcome.
The review distinguishes what is shown, what is claimed, what is missing, and where reliance would be premature.
The finding can support a paid deeper review, partner lane, or production-readiness scope without giving away unlimited architecture work.
Pricing boundary
Fixed-fee TA-14 review may identify gaps, classify evidence, map review findings, and define what is incomplete. Custom implementation guidance, route design, test matrices, evidence packet design, maturity roadmaps, partner operating models, and production-readiness build direction require separate written scope.
TA-14 keeps the first review accessible so teams can see the admissibility gap early. Deeper architecture shaping begins only after scope, boundary, and value exchange are clear.
Public pricing references
These references are used only to show public market entry points for audit, readiness, governance, and consulting-adjacent review. TA-14 review remains a bounded admissible-execution architecture review, not a certification, legal opinion, compliance attestation, or security audit.
SignalARC describes a common productized small-business AI audit tier around $999 and higher tiers above that.
Open referenceAries Consulting Group describes narrow SMB AI readiness audits around $2,000-$8,000 and larger audits above that.
Open referenceTrussed.ai describes AI governance readiness assessments around $15,000-$50,000 and larger governance work above that.
Open referenceRequest review
Send the route, the consequence, the evidence, the relying party, and where authority, binding, commit, execution, and outcome records appear. TA-14 will identify the proper review lane before deeper architecture value is provided.
Direct contact: ta14admissibleexecution@gmail.com